Sonner English Language Training 

   

www.reidsonner.com

 

 

 

Conditional Sentences 

 

Conditional One Conditional Two Conditional Three A Summary

In conditional sentences, we speak hypothetically.
We talk about what would happen as a consequence (or result) of some hypothetical condition.
Therefore, every conditional sentence has two parts:  the CONDITION and the CONSEQUENCE.

In addition, there are three different kinds of conditional sentences.
The first two kinds (we call them "conditional one" and "conditional two") deal with the future or the present.
The difference between the two is based upon probability.
The last kind ("conditional three") deals only with the past.

Let's look more closely at each kind.


Conditional One

 In this kind of sentence, we are discussing a hypothetical situation. The chances of that situation either being true now or becoming true later are relatively good. In any case, we do NOT know for certain if it is true or if it will become true. (If we know for certain that something is true or will become true, then we are not speaking hypothetically!)

THE CONDITION:

THE CONSEQUENCE:

If "A" HAPPENS (in the future),
If "A" IS HAPPENING (now),
If "A" IS (general fact),

"B" WILL HAPPEN as a result.

Notice that the verb in the conditional part of the sentence (called "the conditional clause"), is in the PRESENT tense even when we are talking about something that might happen in the FUTURE!  (This is similar to what was said in the section on the future tense and its time signals.)

Notice also that the verb in the rest of the sentence (called "the main clause") is always in the FUTURE because a consequence is always something that happens later, after a condition is met.

Here are some examples:

If I SELL my boat (in the future),

I WILL TAKE you to dinner.

If it IS SNOWING (right now), 

I WILL DRIVE you home.

If I AM wrong (general fact),   

I WILL BUY you a beer.

The main point here is that the speaker thinks that the chances of the condition being or becoming true are relatively good.
This, of course, is a subjective opinion.
Other speakers may see the chances as relatively bad. If so, then they would choose Conditional Two.


Conditional Two

In this kind of conditional sentence, we are still discussing a hypothetical situation. But now the chances of the situation either being true now or becoming true later are not good or are zero.

THE CONDITION:

THE CONSEQUENCE:

If "A" HAPPENED (in the future),
If "A" WERE HAPPENING (now),
If "A" WERE the case (general fact), 

"B" WOULD HAPPEN as a result.

Notice that now the verb in the conditional clause is in the PAST tense!
In fact, however, it is not really the past tense.
It is the SUBJUNCTIVE.
The subjunctive is used to voice such hypothetical situations.
In English, it looks and sounds exactly the same as the past tense, which makes it easy to learn!
But do not think it has anything to do with the past.
One last word about the subjunctive: It is actually correct to use were with ALL SUBJECTS.
Nevertheless, many native speakers (not only Americans!) mistakenly use "was" with "I", "he", "she", and "it" in conditional two sentences.

The verb in the main clause always appears after the word "would".
This expresses again the conditional nature of the sentence.
A pitfall (or trap) that many people (including native speakers!) fall into is to use the word "would" in BOTH parts of the sentence.
You may hear this often, but it is wrong.

Here are some examples:

If I SOLD my boat (in the future), ...  I WOULD TAKE you to dinner.

If I LIVED  in Japan (general fact), ... I WOULD EAT Sushi often.

If I WERE you (impossible), ... I WOULD ASK an expert.

If it WERE SNOWING (at this moment), ... I WOULD DRIVE you home.

If he WERE more reliable, ... I WOULD WORK with him.

If they WENT out more often, ... they WOULD HAVE more fun.

If I RECEIVED an offer from them, ... I WOULD FALL over from shock.

If he CHANGED his strategy, ... his position WOULD IMPROVE. 

The main point to remember is that the speaker thinks the chances of the condition being or becoming true are relatively bad. 
Again, this is a subjective opinion.  
Other speakers may see the chances as relatively good. 
If so, then they would choose Conditional One.


Conditional Three

In this kind of sentence, the hypothetical situation is in the PAST. 
We are talking about something that did not happen. 
The chances of the condition being true is ZERO, because everyone knows that it did not happen. 
There is no doubt and no disagreement about this fact. 
Nevertheless, we can still talk about the consequences of this hypothetical condition. 
How would the past (or present or even the future) be different if this condition had happened or had been true?

THE CONDITION:

THE CONSEQUENCE:

If "A" had happened (in the past), ...  

"B" WOULD HAVE HAPPENED (in the past).       

"B" WOULD BE HAPPENING (now).

"B" WOULD HAPPEN (in the future).

Notice that the verb in the conditional clause is always with the word "had".
The verb in the main clause is always with the word "would".
If the consequence is in the past, we use "would have".
If the consequence is in the present or future, we use" would".

Here are some examples:

If I HAD LIVED in China as a child,  I WOULD HAVE LEARNED Chinese long ago.

If I HAD LIVED in China as a child,  I WOULD SPEAK Chinese perfectly now.

If I HAD LIVED in China as a child,  I WOULD DO business there in the future.

The main point to remember is that the condition is being presented as an alternative to reality in order to discuss the possible consequences.


A  SUMMARY

If I WIN the Lotto next Saturday, I WILL GIVE you a thousand euros.  
=
I think I have a good chance of winning.

If I WON the Lotto next Saturday, I WOULD GIVE you a thousand euros.
= I think I have a poor chance of winning.

If I HAD WON the Lotto last Saturday, I WOULD HAVE GIVEN you a thousand euros.
= I did not win.


 

 

   

 

 


Copyright © 2023  Sonner ELT -- All rights reserved.     |     Impressum     |